Hardline Curling Brush Update - November 23rd, 2015

Since we opened in 2010, Hardline Curling has built its business on the foundation of one core value - Integrity. Whether dealing with customers, pro-shops, players, the equipment we sell, or the game, our integrity has never been and will never be compromised.

Over the last 2 months, Hardline and those who use its products have been unfairly targeted by groundless accusations and harmful insinuations with respect to the innovative and successful  Hardline icePad curling brush. These accusations have compromised the integrity and trust of not only our company, but of those who play with our gear, whether they are elite or recreational club curlers.

Hardline Curling will no longer sit quiet. Whether it’s on social media or our blog, we will answer those who are failing to give the straight facts. We receive countless emails and calls supporting us, and we owe it to everyone who has put their faith and hard earned dollars into our gear.

Concerning recent WCF rulings, it is important to note that the Hardline icePad is not banned as some have claimed. There are two modifications (inverting the cover and removing the plastic insert) that have to be made for approval in WCF events only, but the icePad is not banned.  In fact, our teams playing in the European championships continue to play with an approved version of the icePad. 

We have been in contact with the WCF concerning equipment. We have made a number of recommendations that would be fair for all suppliers. We have asked the WCF to set parameters as to what is acceptable in terms of performance of brush heads before testing begins. We have asked that Hardline representatives be present for all testing. We have asked what and how tests will be conducted. We have asked Curling Canada to provide all testing data from previous years so we can compare to present day testing. All of our requests have been denied without explanation.

Our recommendations to the WCF even included taking out all intellectual property from suppliers’ pads, with the WCF choosing the fabric. For example, no plastic insert of the icePad, no foil in the Balance Plus pad, no ridges in the Goldline, Asham and Performance pads. Straight fabric on foam. Our opinion is this would ensure fair play for everyone at the Elite level. The WCF did not respond to our recommendation.  While it is an extreme and in our view unnecessary measure, this would ensure fair play if all inserts were removed.

The WCF’s most recent ruling was to take out a part of the icePad’s intellectual property, the plastic insert. The WCF have stated that their decision was based on preliminary test results. We have asked for all the data concerning these tests and the results. Again, the WCF has refused to send us any of this data. 

Hardline believes the WCF has made these recent decisions based on a flawed process and without having concluded all testing required to reach a fair and equitable conclusion. Hardline has engaged legal counsel to, among other things, push for full and complete transparency behind the WCF’s decision-making and to enforce Hardline’s rights as an innovative and hard-working manufacturer. 

  

We stated long ago that any decisions reached should involve all the major stakeholders including players, associations and manufacturers, coming to a decision together regarding what the guidelines should be and what the testing will include going forward. We have also stated that once all the guidelines are set on what is or is not acceptable, an independent testing facility should conduct testing on all products with players and representatives from each stakeholder to oversee all the testing. All results should immediately be given to all stakeholders. This is the only way to ensure a transparent process and optimal solution for all stakeholders.

For the last 4 years, Hardline has manufactured top of the line and innovate equipment without complaint. The recent spate of complaints and accusations are unfounded and damaging to Hardline. Despite making several requests, we have been provided with no evidence to support these exaggerated allegations, such as reports that the icePad makes rocks “move like a joystick”.  We have been sent no evidence because we believe none exists. There is no truth to these allegations. 

Hardline will continue to strive to provide excellent customer service, out-innovate, and out-perform the competition. We are not going away. We are Hardline Nation.

Hardline Curling Press Release Nov 18, 2015 - Response to WCF Moratorium

Hardline Curling Press Release November 18, 2015
Response to WCF Moratorium for remainder of 2015/16 Season

Regarding the moratorium being imposed by the World Curling Federation for all WCF events for the remainder of the 2015/16 season, Hardline Curling disagrees with this decision. We have asked the WCF to see the reports that have led to this decision.  We were promised transparency in all testing, and this was assured to us from day one.  We have not yet received any test results or how tests were administered, or what pads were tested.  We feel this decision has been hastily reached without sufficient and proper independent testing.

Foremost, it must be made clear that this decision reached by the WCF does not affect recreational or house league club play, or recreational open bonspiels.   It is only for World Curling Federation events.  Recreational and club players, and non-WCF events including open and fun bonspiels, are still permitted to play with the Hardline icePad in its current form with the Pro cover and plastic insert, and we encourage all our supporters to continue playing with the best curling brush ever designed in your club leagues, recreational play, and fun bonspiels. 

In fact, we encourage all our Hardline Curling and icePad supporters to write the World Curling Federation and show your support of the icePad and oppose this decision.

Our professional Hardline Curling teams and players have been subject to non-stop bullying and accusations of cheating in recent weeks from their opponents, when our teams have done everything to conform to player agreements and the WCF interim decision of November 6th, 2015.  Hardline Curling feels this is bullying at its ugliest form, and goes against the ideals of curling sportsmanship, and it has to stop.

This targeting of the Hardline icePad and its teams has been way overblown by a small but vocal minority of teams and our competitors.  First, we were accused of having "directional fabric", which has been since proven we do not.  Our teams inverted the icePad cover which was agreed upon as an acceptable solution.  Our teams continued to perform well and win events.  Then the treated finish of the icePad cover was brought into question, and when players realized it is not the fabric, a decision is now being made to remove the plastic insert, which by the way was also utilized by other suppliers in their brush heads.  The truth is it is none of these factors.  What will be attacked next?  When will our accusers understand that it is talent, good shot-making, and effective sweeping techniques that help them win games and events?  Testing has confirmed that all brushes with proper sweeping techniques can achieve the same so-called disputed results.  If this is the case, then why is the icePad still being targeted?

To our detractors who say we are not co-operating, Hardline Curling has had discussions with the WCF and provided them with several options for an equitable standard for elite level competition, including removing all inserts – plastic inserts, foil, foam ridges – and just have an accepted fabric against a cushion or foam.  It is unfortunate that none of these solutions have been adopted, because we feel that it would provide the proper standard and equal playing field that is being requested, which is what everyone is striving for.

Hardline Curling intends to continue to pursue all options available to us to have the icePad reinstated without exception, through proper independent testing.  We will do what is necessary to protect the intellectual property of the icePad and have it approved for play, all the while continuing to provide our elite teams with the equipment necessary that conforms to the ever-changing regulations to help them perform at their best.

We thank all of our supporters during this time for your continued support.  Your emails, phone calls, and social media messages provide us the strength to continue moving forward.  We continue to be hopeful for a fair and equitable resolution in the near future.

WEEK # 9 to 11 UPDATE – TEAM HARDLINE CONTINUES TO WIN

It’s been an interesting last couple of weeks in the curling world.  We thank you all for your emails, tweets, phone calls and texts of support for Hardline and the icePad.  It is very much appreciated!  We’re hoping cooler heads will prevail, and a decision will be made shortly.

But for now, let’s get back to some great results for Team Hardline!

Week # 9

The big event in men’s play was in Portage MB for the Canad Inns Curling Classic.  It featured several Hardline teams in action, including Steve Laycock, Reid Carruthers, and Charley Thomas who all qualified for playoffs.  Mike McEwen, 2 time defending champion and 4 of the last 5 years surprised everyone by not qualifying for playoffs for the first time since joining Team Hardline.  Laycock defeated Carruthers in one quarterfinal, while Thomas defeated Morozumi of Japan to also reach semis.  Laycock then beat Thomas in that semi final and went on to claim their first win with Hardline defeating Kevin Koe in the finals!  Congrats Team Steve Laycock!

(Matt Hermiz/TheGraphic/Postmedia Network)

In Kamloops, Team Dean Joanisse continued their great play reaching the finals of the Hub International Crown of Curling, defeating Kim of South Korea, and Jim Cotter to get there.  In the finals, they lost to Sean Geall by a close 5-4 score! 

In women’s play, Team Allison Flaxey reached the finals of the Stroud Sleeman Cash Spiel.

Week # 10

Week # 10 action saw the top men’s teams playing in Gatineau QC, including one of the hottest teams this year Team Brad Gushue.  Surprisingly, many of the top favorites did not qualify for playoffs, including Edin, Simmons, and Murdoch.  Team Gushue ran the table going a perfect 7-0 to win their 4^th event of the season!  Congrats Team Gushue!

Team Gushue (Photo Challenge Chateau Cartier Facebook page)

In Red Deer AB, the Red Deer Curling Classic was played, and teams Dean Joanisse and Charley Thomas both reached the quarterfinals.

In Champery SUI, Team Peter De Cruz qualified for playoffs in the Champery Masters event, losing in the quarterfinals.

In women’s action, the Canad Inns Women’s Classic was played in Portage MB, and teams Kristy McDonald and Kerri Einarson reached the quarterfinals, and Tracy Fleury made it to the semi finals! Great playing by all!

In Red Deer AB at the Red Deer Classic, Kalynn Park reached the quarterfinals, while teams Chelsea Carey and Nadine Chyz both reached the semi finals!  A nice showing for our teams.

In Moncton NB, Team Theresa Breen were finalists of the Lady Monctonian Invitational.

Week # 11

Week # 11 had all eyes watching the GSOC Masters in Truro NS.  The top 15 men’s and women’s teams were placed in 3 groups of 5 for round robin play. 

In men’s play, defending champion Team Brad Gushue went 4-0 and secured their spot in the playoffs.  Team Mike McEwen went 3-1 and also secured their spot.  Team Reid Carruthers finished 2-2 and qualified direct to the quarter finals with a good shootout score.  Team Steve Laycock also finished 2-2, but had to play Glenn Howard in a tiebreaker, and defeated them to reach the quarterfinals.

In the quarterfinals, it was 2 Hardline battles, with Gushue playing Laycock, and McEwen playing Carruthers.  In the 4^th end of the Gushue v Laycock quarterfinal, Brad Gushue slipped and fell face first onto the ice, suffering a cut just above the eye.  It was a very scary situation and play on all 4 sheets came to a stop.  Thankfully, he was ok.  He was taken to hospital for stitches, while the rest of the team played 3 players.  Laycock continued his great play, and Gushue returned in the 7^th end, but in the end, Laycock won by a 5-2 score.   In the other Hardline battle, McEwen defeated Carruthers by a 7-4 score.

In the semi finals, Laycock faced a tough Jim Cotter team and went down to defeat by an 8-3 score.  In the other semi final, McEwen faced Kevin Koe, with McEwen scoring a big 3 in the 6^th end to take a 5-3 lead.  In the 7^th end, McEwen made two great shots to remove all of Koe’s rocks in the house, which led to a blank end.  In the 8^th, with time running short for both teams, Koe released his rock with 1 second left on their time clock, but missed his shot to score 2, and McEwen took home the victory.

In the finals, McEwen scored a big deuce in the 6^th end, and then forced Cotter to take one in the 7^th end.  In the 8^th end, McEwen calmly drew to the 4 foot against two counters, and took home the Masters trophy for their 3^rd win this year, and 6^th GSOC title of their career.

Photo Anil Mungal - GSOC

In women’s action, Silvana Tirinzoni and Kristy McDonald both finished with 3-1 round robin records and qualified for playoffs.  Tirinzoni faced Kerri Einarson in the quarterfinals, and it was an exciting high scoring game, but in the end, Einarson won by a 10-7 score.  McDonald faced hometown favorite Mary Anne Arsenault in another quarterfinal winning 5-2 to reach the semi finals.  In the semis, skip Kristy McDonald came down with the flu and was unable to play.  Kate Cameron assumed skip duties and the team played with 3 players against Team Homan.  They gave it a valiant effort, but Homan eventually won the game 8-5.  Congrats to all Team Hardline for their great play at The Masters.

In other men’s action, in Sarnia ON, Team John Shuster captured the Huron RepoGraphics Oil Heritage Classic, continuing their strong play!  In Medicine Hat AB, Hardline supporters Shaun Meachem won the Medicine Hat Charity Classic, Jason Jacobson reaching semis, and team Peter De Cruz made the quarterfinals.

In women’s action, Team Jacqueline Harrison captured the Gord Carroll Curling Classic for their 2^nd win of the season!  Well played ladies!   Team Allison Flaxey also qualified for playoffs, reaching the quarterfinals. 

Hardline WIN Count after Week # 11:  21

Brad Gushue – Stu Sells Oakville

Silvana Tirinzoni – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 1

Kerri Einarson – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 2

Jacqueline Harrison – OCT Oakville Fall Classic

Brad Gushue – AMJ Campbell Shorty Jenkins Classic

Shaun Meachem – HDF Insurance Shootout

Dean Joanisse – Cloverdale Cashspiel

Mike McEwen - Point Optical Curling Classic

Allison Flaxey - KW Fall Curling Classic

Michelle Monford - Mother Club Curling Classic

Theresa Breen - Appleton Rum Cashspiel

Tyler Tardi - Anita Cochrane Memorial Junior Cash

Brad Gushue - Swiss Cup Basel

Mike McEwen - Stu Sells Toronto

Tyler Tardi - Abbotsford Junior Cashspiel

Steve Laycock – Canad Inns Men’s Classic

Brad Gushue – Challenge Chateau Cartier Gatineau

Mike McEwen – GSOC Masters

John Shuster – Huron ReproGraphics Oil Heritage Classic

Shaun Meachem – Medicine Hat Charity Classic

Jacqueline Harrison – Gord Carroll Curling Classic

TO THE PLAYERS

TO PLAYERS WHO SIGNED PLAYERS AGREEMENT:

Last week, a new pad was introduced at the Stu Sells that had directional fabric, to prove a point that directional fabrics take away from the spirit of the game. The “Blackhead” brushes by our competitor were not only able to manipulate rocks far beyond reasonable expectations of a rock’s natural path, but they also damaged the ice to such an extent as to make it almost impossible to give opposing players the ability to make shots. These “Blackhead” brushes were NEVER intended to be sold.

Players using “Blackhead” brushes were asked to not use these brushes by the players at that event. Their response was that if they had to remove them from the game, then Hardline teams had to stop using the icePad fabric.  Hardline teams, after receiving significant pressure from all the other players, agreed that the “Blackhead” brush has no place in the game, and agreed to these demands, for the good of the game.

Since then, a player-driven agreement was sent for teams to sign, restricting directional fabric for use in games from the WCT and Grand Slams. Top teams signed the agreement, including Hardline teams.  The player agreement clearly states no single manufacturer or supplier is being targeted.  So then why was an ultimatum given to ONLY our Hardline teams not to play with the icePad cover as recently as this weekend?   Somehow, the icePad has also been targeted for having directional fabric. The fabric on the icePad is NOT a directional fabric. Hardline does not know how many times we can repeat the same thing. THE ICEPAD DOES NOT HAVE DIRECTIONAL FABRIC!

We believe you signed this player agreement and were misled into believing the icePad cover falls into the category of restricted fabrics, a self imposed “rule” by players.  The fabric on the icePad fabric has been used for the last 3 years at ALL levels of play.  It is not “new” fabric. 

This player agreement is a knee-jerk reaction to restrict directional fabric and we agree that directional fabric should be outlawed as we stated previously.  But the underlying intention is a blatant attempt by one of our competitors to discredit us due to an erosion in their market share. Some players have refused to sign the agreement for the simple reason of not knowing what they are signing. What is directional fabric?  Other teams have refused to sign the agreement understanding the baseless nature of an attack towards Hardline.  Other players, namely Hardline teams, signed the agreement so as to not be open to criticism by their peers. This is pure bullying by certain non-Hardline players towards Hardline players. Either stop using the icePad or "be looked down upon". 

There are too many questions to be answered before a proper decision can be made.  There has been no due process.   The Hardline icePad has been essentially found guilty without due process.  Why is that? 

The Hardline icePad cover has been played at all levels of play, from recreational to elite level, the last 3 years. Never once has there been a complaint. The “Blackhead” brush was used at one WCT event. After the first day, the number of complaints was staggering. All players were against this brush. How can one compare one established product which has never had a complaint in 4 years to another brush that was introduced and HAD COMPLAINTS FROM THE MOMENT IT WAS USED?

TO THE PLAYERS: We believe you have been misled into believing the icePad fabric belongs on the same restricted list as the “Blackhead’ brush. We ask you to remove this restriction on the icePad, and start asking questions to those responsible, and know all the facts. The integrity of due process, and your own integrity, should not be compromised.

At Hardline, our integrity, and our reputation, as well as every Hardline athlete, from Pro, to 1st year curler, will not be compromised by the few who have a secret agenda. The truth about corporate bullying will come out shortly. Anybody who has ever seen, bought, played against an icePad knows the players assertions about directional fabric on the icePad are baseless and without merit. It is up to you to know that you have every right to leave your name on the list, as long as you are informed about what you signed. Integrity of the game, as well as your own integrity, are both at stake. We ask you to do the right thing – remove any restriction on the icePad.  

HARDLINE CURLING PRESS RELEASE - OCTOBER 15TH, 2015

Since 2010, Hardline Curling has been in business to serve the curling community and provide curlers with the most innovative curling equipment. In 2012 we introduced the icePad, considered by many the most technologically advanced curling brush ever invented. Before we started selling the icePad in 2012, Hardline Curling submitted it to Curling Canada for testing to get approval. Every year since, we have co-operated with Curling Canada to have the icePad tested, and never once, has there been any negative feedback concerning directional-fabric or ice damage. In the last four years, the icePad has been played with at all Curling Canada and World Curling Federation events including the Canada Cup, Scotties, Brier and World men’s/mixed fours/mixed doubles/seniors. Never once have there been any negative comments about ice damage or directional-fabric issues. The icePad has been using the same fabric since 2013.

Since 2012, thousands of recreational and elite level curlers have chosen to play with and enjoy the many benefits of the icePad. In 2014, two high profile elite teams – Mike McEwen and Reid Carruthers – chose the icePad and both teams had highly successful seasons. Since then, dozens of other elite teams have chosen to play with the icePad and even more teams have approached us for sponsorship. All icePad players have raved about the effectiveness of the icePad.

In recent weeks there has been an elite-level-player movement to remove so-called “directional-fabric” brushes from the elite-level of play only, including, unfairly, the icePad. Some claim that with the power of elite-level sweepers, they have the ability to direct the curling stone, or control it like a “joystick.” This group has brought some unwarranted claims that anyone playing with the icePad has an unfair advantage.

First, we strongly disagree that the icePad cover has directional-fabric. Our fabric is diamond-shaped and not uni-directional. Second, we further disagree with the term “unfair advantage.” “Unfair” would indicate that the icePad is not playing within the rules of curling, which is not true!  “Unfair” would mean that not everyone could play with it when, in fact, the icePad is available for anyone to use and play with.  However, if one chooses not to play with it that is their choice.

Part of this player movement is to enact regulations on what brush fabrics are acceptable. Since there are no regulations for fabrics currently in place, and the icePad was approved for play based on today’s rules on equipment, how can anyone claim our fabric is unfair? The icePad DOES NOT damage or alter the ice in a significant way! In fact, one of our primary marketing messages for years has been that OUR COVERS DAMAGE THE ICE LESS than any of the other fabrics currently on the market.

At the last WCT event in Toronto, a few select teams came out with an extremely abrasive directional fabric that damaged the ice to the extent that opposing players were unable to make shots. We believe that this abrasive brush went against the rules of curling and was used only to try and prove a point against Hardline Curling and the icePad.  From the Curling Canada Rules for General Play for the 2014-2018 season, from article 15, section 1: “A player shall not use footwear or equipment that may damage or affect the playing quality of the ice surface.” This is exactly what this new fabric did and therefore IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEEMED ILLEGAL and been removed from play.

Hardline Curling believes that all of this trumped-up controversy has been engineered by a small group of players, acting on behalf of their equipment supplier in order to stop the loss of its market share to Hardline. This is nothing other than corporate bullying. We believe that the laws of this country afford us the right to compete in a fair and open marketplace. In fact, Hardline loves competition. We believe that if equipment companies have the innovative ideas to put out equipment that stays within the scope of the rules, then this can only help grow the sport. Since the 1990's, there have been two major changes in brush technology: the introduction of the oval swivel head brush and the icePad.

If it was felt that the icePad provided an unfair advantage, why were these issues not brought up in the last three years when the icePad has been on tour? Why was this not brought up during the off-season in order to give suppliers a fair chance to adhere to acceptable standards to the elite players? Why should Hardline have to incur extra costs to supply our players with replacements when we have done absolutely nothing wrong? WHY DID CERTAIN TEAMS ON THE CURL CANADA LETTER APPROACH US FOR SPONSORSHIP THIS PAST SUMMER IF THEY THOUGHT THAT THE ICEPAD WAS AN ISSUE?

We are in full agreement that “directional-fabric” brushes to control stones have no place in the game of curling at the elite level. We believe that the WCF should hire an independent organization that has no affiliations with any equipment supplier. Parameters should be set as to what is and is not acceptable. Equipment suppliers should be allowed to be present for all testing. Equipment suppliers should be given access to all data acquired during testing. We want any future rule changes to be fair with no bias towards one supplier over another.

This has been a huge distraction to all elite teams, but especially to our Hardline teams who have taken unwarranted criticism when they have done absolutely nothing wrong within the current rules of play.  To question the integrity of Hardline athletes who use the icePad is totally unacceptable.

Hardline also wishes to clarify the fact that the icePad is still approved at all levels of play, whether you are a club curler, Junior, Senior, Master and at all Provincial, National and World events.

Hardline Curling has received tremendous support over the last few difficult days. The support is very much appreciated, and the vast majority of curlers can see exactly what is happening here.



Archie Manavian
Hardline Curling, President
514-249-5258
877-908-4273

WEEK # 8 UPDATE - McEWEN WINS IN TORONTO!

The top men's teams were in Toronto for the Stu Sells Toronto Tankard, including defending champions Reid Carruthers.  Also in the top field were Gushue, Howard, Jacobs, Shuster, Edin and McEwen.
There were several hard fought games, and after an A semis final loss, McEwen qualified for playoffs through the B event.  In the C event, Gushue and Carruthers fought through and qualified for playoffs.
In the end, McEwen defeated Glenn Howard in the finals by a score of 5-1.  A great 2nd win of the season for Team McEwen.

In Edmonton, the DHD Classic was played, with several top ranked teams from Western Canada, including Steve Laycock, Charley Thomas, and Kevin Koe.  Both Laycock and Thomas reached the playoffs, with Thomas losing in the quarters, and Laycock reaching the semi finals before losing to eventual winner Kevin Koe.

On the ladies side, the Stu Sells Toronto featured several Hardline teams, with Jacqueline Harrison and Theresa Breen both qualifying for playoffs but both losing in the quarterfinals.

In Calgary, one of the top women's events was played - the Curlers Corner Autumn Gold Classic and featured several top women's teams including Homan, Jones, and Hardline's Chelsea Carey and Tracy Fleury.  Both Carey and Fleury qualified for playoffs with Fleury going perfect 4-0 in the round robin, while Carey fought hard through the C event to qualify.  Fleury lost to a strong Homan team in the quarterfinals, while Chelsea Carey made it to the finals defeating Michele Jaeggi and Val Sweeting to reach the finals, before losing to Rachel Homan.  This makes back to back runner up finishes for Chelsea Carey's team!

Over in Switzerland, at the Women's Masters Basel, Team Silvana Tirinzoni continued their strong play this season, qualifying A side for playoffs, and defeating Hanah Fleming and Binia Feltscher to reach the finals against Anna Sidorova of Russia.  With a 6-4 lead in the 8th end, Sidorova made an incredible shot to score 3 and win the game 7-6.  A tough loss for Tirinzoni, but a fantastic weekend and the great play continues.

In St Paul MN, Team Courtney George reached the semi finals of the St Paul Cashspiel!  Nice playing!

In BC, Team Tyler Tardi continues their great play by winning the Abbotsford Junior Cashspiel! They are definitely a force to be reckoned with!


Hardline WIN Count after Week # 8:  15

Brad Gushue – Stu Sells Oakville
Silvana Tirinzoni – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 1
Kerri Einarson – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 2
Jacqueline Harrison – OCT Oakville Fall Classic
Brad Gushue – AMJ Campbell Shorty Jenkins Classic
Shaun Meachem – HDF Insurance Shootout
Dean Joanisse – Cloverdale Cashspiel
Mike McEwen - Point Optical Curling Classic
Allison Flaxey - KW Fall Curling Classic
Michelle Monford - Mother Club Curling Classic
Theresa Breen - Appleton Rum Cashspiel
Tyler Tardi - Anita Cochrane Memorial Junior Cash
Brad Gushue - Swiss Cup Basel
Mike McEwen - Stu Sells Toronto
Tyler Tardi - Abbotsford Junior Cashspiel

WEEK # 7 UPDATE - GUSHUE WINS IN BASEL!

One of the men's events on the WCT in week # 7 was the Swiss Cup Basel, and several top world men's teams were in the field including Murdoch, Brewster, Ulsrud, Casey, Kauste and Gushue.  

After losing their first game of the event, Gushue went on 8-0 run and won the event for their 3rd win of the year to go along with two finals.

In Vernon BC, Team Dean Joanisse continued their great start to the season with a finals result in the Prestige Hotels and Resorts Curling Classic. Joanisse had wins against Canadian champions Pat Simmons and BC champs Jim Cotter also.   In the rematch in the finals against Pat Simmons took the title over Joanisse.  Keep up the great play Team Joanisse!

On the women's side in the same event, Team Chelsea Carey continued their great play of late earning a finals result, losing to Stefanie Lawton of Saskatchewan.  Another Hardline team, Team Kerri Einarson, also finished with a semi-finals results.  Congrats ladies!

Hardline WIN Count after Week # 7:  13

Brad Gushue – Stu Sells Oakville

Silvana Tirinzoni – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 1

Kerri Einarson – GSOC Tour Challenge Tier 2

Jacqueline Harrison – OCT Oakville Fall Classic

Brad Gushue – AMJ Campbell Shorty Jenkins Classic

Shaun Meachem – HDF Insurance Shootout

Dean Joanisse – Cloverdale Cashspiel

Mike McEwen - Point Optical Curling Classic

Allison Flaxey - KW Fall Curling Classic

Michelle Monford - Mother Club Curling Classic

Theresa Breen - Appleton Rum Cashspiel

Tyler Tardi - Anita Cochrane Memorial Junior Cash

Brad Gushue - Swiss Cup Basel